VeggieBoards banner
1 - 20 of 57 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
207 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
The World Wildlife Fund (also known as the Worldwide Fund for Nature, or simply WWF) has been actively pressuring government agencies in the U.S., Europe, and Canada to increase the amount of testing that they require for pesticides and other chemicals. The result of the WWFs lobbying has been the establishment of what threaten to be the largest animal-testing programs of all time.

And thats not all. As one would expect of an organization founded by trophy hunters, the WWF does not oppose killing animals for sport. The WWF believes that culling (read killing) elephants and seals is OK, it supports the slaughter of whales by native tribes, and it refuses to speak out against steel-jaw leghold traps.

Surprised? Please click on the link below to learn more about why PETA thinks the WWF should change its name to the Wicked Wildlife Fund.

Click here to read more

http://www.wickedwildlifefund.com/index.html

They have also recenlty teamed up with the evil PROCTER& GAMBLE plus others :

http://www.bava.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/WWF.html

The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) has been actively pressuring government agencies in the United States, Canada, and Europe to greatly increase the amount of testing that they require for new and existing pesticides and other chemicals. The result of the WWF's lobbying has been the establishment of what threatens to be the largest animal-testing programs of all time.

The WWF was the driving force in pressuring the US Congress to legislate the screening of chemicals for "endocrine (hormone) disrupting" effects and has subsequently been heavily involved in establishing the framework for the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) massive chemical-testing program now under development. As its Web site points out: "WWF invested substantial resources in the EPA's Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee," which "agreed upon a set of tests to form the foundation for the screening and testing program." What the WWF neglects to mention, however, is that 10 of the 15 recommended screens and tests are animal-poisoning studies, some of which kill hundreds or thousands of animals at a time. According to scientific estimates, the WWF-backed endocrine testing program will kill up to 1.2 million animals for every 1,000 chemicals tested, and with environmental organisations pressing for tens of thousands of chemicals to be retested under this program, the toll in animal suffering and death will be staggering. The WWF is also pressuring government agencies in Europe to embark on a similar animal-testing program.

In addition to lobbying for more chemical testing, the WWF has teamed up with Procter & Gamble, S.C. Johnson, and other chemical companies to create an institute to pursue "basic research" on endocrine disruptors. On top of this, the WWF is now pushing the US Congress to pass a bill that would pour additional millions in public funds into endocrine research, much of which would likely be used to fund experiments on animals.

Unfortunately, the "endocrine disruptor" issue is not an isolated example. The WWF has been a major force in pressuring the European Union to amend its Chemicals Policy to require companies to test and retest as many as 30,000 new and existing chemicals. The British Institute for Environmental Health estimates that this process will kill upwards of 45 million animals if the standard battery of animal-poisoning tests is used. The WWF's US and Canadian offices are also calling for more testing of pesticides, despite the fact that more than 9,000 animals are already killed for each pesticide product on the market. The organisation has called for certain pesticides to be tested for "developmental neurotoxicity" (DNT) using a test that kills upwards of 1,300 animals each time it is conducted. This test has been heavily criticised by scientists, including the EPA's own Scientific Advisory Panel, which concluded that "the exposure of rat foetus/pups was not shown to be equivalent to human foetus/infant during equivalent stages of brain development" and that "the current form of the DNT guideline is not a sensitive indicator of toxicity to the offspring." In other words, WWF is calling for thousands of animals to be killed in a test that scientists admit is not relevant to humans!

In its defence, the WWF says that "in the absence of effective, validated alternatives, WWF believes that limited animal testing is needed for the long-term protection of wildlife and people throughout the world." However, there is nothing "limited" about the massive amount of animal testing that the WWF is endorsing. Dr. Joshua Lederberg, Nobel Laureate in Medicine, pointed out in 1981: "It is simply not possible with all the animals in the world to go through chemicals in the blind way we have at the present time, and reach credible conclusions about the hazards to human health." Now more than 20 years later, millions of animals are still dying in agonizing chemical toxicity tests, and we are no closer to getting dangerous chemicals out of the environment. In fact, despite killing hundreds of thousands of animals in painful chemical toxicity tests, the EPA has not banned a single toxic industrial chemical in more than a decade!

The WWF endorses the killing of wild animals, too. For information on this, and who you can complain to, please visit: www.wickedwildlifefund.com

See also: The Enemy Within
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
2,081 Posts
I found this out a while back, a year or so. I was pretty pissed because I've given them donations before. I guess that's what I get for not researching before voting with my dollars.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,262 Posts
The National Wildlife Federation is another one. Many people who purchase their cutesy wildlife Christmas cards have no idea they are an umbrella group for numerous state hunting clubs.

Animal People News www.animalpeoplenews.org , is a great source of info on the many "wildlife" groups that actively support or even facilitate hunting.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,546 Posts
Cool, I'll make a note of sending them some $ when I've bought all the vehicle parts I currently need.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
684 Posts
First, let me say, that is absolutely disgusting. Sickening. Just. Ugh. I'm glad I've never given them donations or anything.

Next, let me say that at first I thought you meant World Wrestling Federation
. Heh.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
0 Posts
If there ever is/was/will be a hell or bad place or punishment for people of some kind*, the people who conduct animal testing would go there/get it. There's no excuse for such horrendous abuse.

Thanks for posting this. I hope other VBers read this and stop funding the World Wildlife Fund if they are and put their dollars elsewhere.. like on companies that provide products that are free from animal testing. Dollars send messages.

*I'm trying to cover all grounds here and represent the multiple beliefs present on VB.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,934 Posts
There's no need to test pesticides. We know they are meant to kill. They are MEANT TO KILL! Therefore they are DEADLY.

There is no need for more deadly materials on this planet. WWF should call for a MORATORIUM on all DEADLY MATERIALS.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
813 Posts
I was surprised to hear about this recently & changed one of my credit cards form WWF to the ASPCA becuase of the hidden truths I learned about.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
820 Posts
The WWF has never been on my list of preferred charities, but I had no idea that they actively supported animal testing and hunting. Now I'll remember to throw their junk mail right in the recycle bin.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,134 Posts
I'd like to see some support for the allegations made in the article.
The site claims that WWF is pro animal testing, but WWF says:

Quote:
Part of this process requires focused chemical testing which WWF believes should rely on non-animal

methods wherever these are available. Even where non-animal test methods are not available, we oppose any

outdated or unnecessary animal testing. At the same time, we continue to call for increased funding to develop

non-animal tests as a matter of urgency. Underlying these views, WWF supports the swiftest possible

transition away from animal testing consistent with placing the fewest animals at risk of exposure to harmful

chemicals, whether in the wild or in laboratories.
You can also check out their website, www.wwf.org to see their statement on toxic chemicals, which do not call for increased testing, but a switch to less dangerous compounds.

Also, WWF was founded by a biologist from the UK, not "trophy hunters".

The WWF, in India fought *against* elephant culls, not for them.

There may be some truth on this website, but there's a lot of garbage as well.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,262 Posts
Long before I knew about PETA's complaints, I questioned support of WWF based on their philosophy and actions. Perusing WWF's materials it is clear that WWF subscribes to the "hunter-conservationist" view of wildlife as resources.

Animal People News is an independent newspaper and a decent source for information on various organizations. Here are some articles of interest regarding the WWF and other groups:

http://www.animalpeoplenews.org/94/5/editorial.html

http://www.animalpeoplenews.org/keepingBarnum1200.html

http://www.animalpeoplenews.org//05/...nploy12.05.htm

But honestly, I think one of the worst examples of WWF's wildlife policies is their support of the brutal Canadian seal hunt. I used to have a news clip about WWF's stance, but unfortunately the link was taken down. So instead here's this link:

http://www.canadiansealhunt.com/wwf.html
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
21 Posts
Thats horriable! I didnt know the WWf supported the seal hunt. How can they say they are for animals? I feel the seal hunt should be banned, as a Canadian it is embaressing.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,009 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by canadian25 View Post

Thats horriable! I didnt know the WWf supported the seal hunt. How can they say they are for animals? I feel the seal hunt should be banned, as a Canadian it is embaressing.
What does the general Canadian public feel towards the seal hunt?
 
1 - 20 of 57 Posts
Top