VeggieBoards banner

1 - 20 of 45 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,203 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16739093/" target="_blank">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16739093/</a> what a thoughtful wife <img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title=":rolleyes:">
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,134 Posts
Um..yeah.<br><br><br><br><img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title=":rolleyes:">
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,477 Posts
Even if I naturally had a baby on a friday, if hubby/daddy was at the game on the following sunday I would be pissed. You haven't even recovered fully from labor two days after...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
0 Posts
What the ****? Why does this stupid stuff make headlines?<br><br><br><br>
Thanks for posting this to remind me of why I hate people. <img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/smiley.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title=":)"> (That's a joke. I don't hate.)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,902 Posts
Don't people choose the dates of their inducement all the time? I don't see what the big deal is. Not newsworthy, not anger worthy either.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10,153 Posts
I don't see what the big deal is. She was probably sick and tired of being pregnant anyways and the doctors did offer it as an option.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,134 Posts
<div class="quote-container"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>Thalia</strong> <a href="/forum/post/0"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif" style=""></a><br><br>
Don't people choose the dates of their inducement all the time?</div>
</div>
<br>
If they're doing it to watch the Superbowl or the World Series or the finale of Lost, then they're just as silly as this woman.<br><br><br><br>
I supppose I'm just not dedicated enough to my favorite teams. <img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/tongue3.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title=":p">
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,451 Posts
i find this article sad. i find elective c-sections problematic as well as inducements. there is a lot of material out there to suggest that these things are dangerous to both mothers and children, often resulting in premature births and the related issues.<br><br><br><br>
it's sad when a child's health is less important than a doctor's pocket, golf game, or a father's football tickets.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,921 Posts
It was 3 days before her due date. I don't see what the big deal is.<br><br><br><br>
It would be different had it been weeks before.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,451 Posts
due dates given by ultrasound are known for being inaccurate up to 3 weeks inaccurate. also, many people count form the 'last menses' which also gives an inacuracy (could be anywhere from 1 to 3 weeks).<br><br><br><br>
both of these methods place "estimated" due dates, which typically are anywhere from 1 to 3 weeks off--the date being 1-3 weeks earlier than the actual due date if one used the date of ovulation (via charting or related).<br><br><br><br>
thus, many babies are being born up to 3 weeks prematurely, and often they'll schedule a section for the 35th week (when lungs are developed), but based on an estimated due date. thus, babies electively induced at the 40th week may be having a baby as young as only 37 weeks (still 3 weeks of gestation), babies electively induced at the 35th may be only 32 weeks and thus may not be fully developed to handle the outside world.<br><br><br><br>
beyond this, both inducing and elective c-sections carry risks to both mother and infant for injury or death. these risks are both unnecessary and they are far lesser when birth naturally occurs. there is plenty of information about this on the internet, honestly.<br><br><br><br>
my biggest problem isn't with this woman's choice, but with the underlying theory that it's ok to induce birth for convenience.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
13,022 Posts
<div class="quote-container"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>zoebird</strong> <a href="/forum/post/0"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif" style=""></a><br><br><br>
beyond this, both inducing and elective c-sections carry risks to both mother and infant for injury or death. these risks are both unnecessary and they are far lesser when birth naturally occurs. there is plenty of information about this on the internet, honestly.</div>
</div>
<br><br><br><br><br>
There are also valid medical reasons to to elect to be induced or have a c-section. I don't believe there is anything wrong with a mother and her physician making a decision that is best for them, and I am certain together they can come up with a better plan that what a yoga instructor can give them.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,929 Posts
This actually cracked me up. I don't see the big deal at all. Those tix were impossible to get. Babies can come anytime...A chance at the Super Bowl comes every 22 years for us <img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/grin.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title=":D">
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,451 Posts
tame:<br><br><br><br>
first, i agree that there are 'valid medical reasons' for c sections and inducements which far outweigh the risks of natural births in that situation. I also agree that parents and doctors can make these decisions. but, this is irrelevant to the post topic--which is about inducing or sectioning purely electively, that is without a medical reason, for reasons of convenience.<br><br><br><br>
second, my profession doesn't preclude me from having an opinion on a cultural ideology about a woman having a baby early for non-medical reasons such as 'her husband wnats to go to a football game.' to me, this doesn't quallify as a 'valid medical reason' for inducing or sectioning.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,134 Posts
Perhaps a valid medical reasoning argument could be made on behalf of the husband. If the mom went into labor on game day and he left her alone at the hospital, she might kill him.
 

·
...
Joined
·
3,936 Posts
I read that babies that are premature grow up to be people who hate to be rushed.<br><br><br><br>
I'm with zoebird.<br><br>
Having read "The Primal Scream" years ago, there are also some very good psychological reasons why a birth should not be rushed.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,134 Posts
Where did you read that?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
20,217 Posts
<div class="quote-container"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>IamJen</strong> <a href="/forum/post/0"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif" style=""></a><br><br>
Perhaps a valid medical reasoning argument could be made on behalf of the husband. If the mom went into labor on game day and he left her alone at the hospital, she might kill him.</div>
</div>
<br><br><br><img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/laugh.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title=":lol:">
 

·
...
Joined
·
3,936 Posts
<div class="quote-container"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>IamJen</strong> <a href="/forum/post/0"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif" style=""></a><br><br>
Where did you read that?</div>
</div>
<br><br><br>
it was in "the primal scream", although it may only apply to some people.
 
1 - 20 of 45 Posts
Top