VeggieBoards banner

Should all animal testing be banned?

  • I donÂ’t accept that animal testing should be banned.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I donÂ’t know that animal testing should be banned.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
1 - 20 of 131 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
25,067 Posts
Short answer: yes.<br><br>
Longer answer: well yeah.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,473 Posts
Even if someone didn't think it should be banned for whatever reason, I don't think they'd come out of the closet about it on a veg*n board.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
4,482 Posts
<div class="quote-container"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>Elena99</strong> <a href="/forum/post/0"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif" style=""></a><br><br>
Even if someone didn't think it should be banned for whatever reason, I don't think they'd come out of the closet about it on a veg*n board.</div>
</div>
<br><br><br>
Think they have on several occasion for medical reason "came out "and agreed , diabetics were some
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
519 Posts
I voted Yes, it's unethical and unnecessary.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
564 Posts
<div class="quote-container"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>Sevenseas</strong> <a href="/forum/post/0"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif" style=""></a><br><br>
Short answer: yes.<br><br>
Longer answer: well yeah.</div>
</div>
<br><br><br><img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/yes.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title=":yes:"> and ummm <img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/yes.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title=":yes:"> is should be banned
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
25,067 Posts
<div class="quote-container"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>Elena99</strong> <a href="/forum/post/0"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif" style=""></a><br><br>
Even if someone didn't think it should be banned for whatever reason, I don't think they'd come out of the closet about it on a veg*n board.</div>
</div>
<br>
On the contrary, vivisection advocates on VB have sometimes gladly expressed their views, going so far as to enthusiastically proclaim how they would sacrifice their own companion animals to save humans.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,691 Posts
I think it should be banned. I think it's a bit cruel and inhumane to force an animal to be a testing subject against its will.<br><br><br><br>
If you want something to be tested so bad, there are clinical trials where people can be tested on. You want a cure for cancer? Volunteer for testing different methods of treatment that are undergoing research and study.<br><br><br><br>
Want to know if the lipstick really stays on for 8 hours? Volunteer to test it yourself.<br><br><br><br>
It doesn't make any sense that we test our things that we are going to use on animals that will never have any use for these things. On top of that, we do it against their will. At least people can consent to the testing.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
519 Posts
<div class="quote-container"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>HandcuffedAngel</strong> <a href="/forum/post/0"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif" style=""></a><br><br>
I think it should be banned. I think it's a bit cruel and inhumane to force an animal to be a testing subject against its will.<br><br><br><br>
If you want something to be tested so bad, there are clinical trials where people can be tested on. You want a cure for cancer? Volunteer for testing different methods of treatment that are undergoing research and study.<br><br><br><br>
Want to know if the lipstick really stays on for 8 hours? Volunteer to test it yourself.<br><br><br><br>
It doesn't make any sense that we test our things that we are going to use on animals that will never have any use for these things. On top of that, we do it against their will. At least people can consent to the testing.</div>
</div>
<br><br><br>
Exactly, people who are for vivisection say things like "if it saves humans lives it's worth the sacrafice". Well that's pretty easy to say when <i>you're</i> not the one doing the sacraficing. Anyone can say it's worth the sacrafice when it's not you that has to give up anything, when we force others to make the "sacrafice".
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,489 Posts
<div class="quote-container"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>indigo</strong> <a href="/forum/post/0"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif" style=""></a><br><br>
Should animal testing be banned?</div>
</div>
<br><br><br>
Yes.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
0 Posts
Does this really need an answer? Of course it should be banned! <img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/veryangry.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title=":grr:">
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,164 Posts
Absolutely. I always wavered on this point until I watched the movie <span style="text-decoration:underline;">Earthlings</span>. When you actually see what goes on in laboratories and the unfathomable suffering these animals go through, it is just shocking. Kind of like watching <span style="text-decoration:underline;">Meet Your Meat</span> and the like... There are things that NO animal of any species should ever have to go through.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,921 Posts
<img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/yes.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title=":yes:"> Yes it should be banned.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
177 Posts
Yes.<br><br><br><br>
Animal testing is completely unnecessary in most cases and I believe that pharmaceutical and cosmetics companies use it because it's cheaper and easier than testing on humans.<br><br><br><br>
I don't need or want animal tested H&BA products, and there are plenty of people with various health conditions who would gladly volunteer for clinical trials. I have severe asthma and have volunteered for such trials.
 
1 - 20 of 131 Posts
Top