This.Originally Posted by Sevenseas
I don't think this is, as such, indicative of any selling of principles or any change. Many people who eat meat may object to some particular issues of animal welfare, like elephants in the circus, or puppy mills, or foie gras, or fur farming, despite the fact that they don't object to exploiting and abusing animals for other purposes. It's not a worldview that makes any sense, but that's what many people believe, and PETA uses that.
It would be a different issue if she had opposed fur coats and were now wearing one, as I think some PETA models have done. Because then it's a direct contradiction.
But I wonder what her being naked has to do with boycotting the circus. Oh, that's right, nothing whatsoever.
I don't think those are love handles. They're hips. We womenfolk have larger ones cuz we spew out babies. As for her face I don't see what you mean. Besides...I doubt she was a vegetarian when she shot that anti-circus adOriginally Posted by Fatman
Dont get me wrong here but, look at her face, its more rounded, more meat on it, and she has a good start on some love handles. And yes, she is still pretty damn hot in both pictures.