Joined
·
429 Posts
One of the arguments for vegetarianism is that human beings don't need meat to live. That is true, seeing as though I haven't died yet. But I've been reading a lot of stuff about how human beings' bodies' are designed to eat meat (wild game actually). The simple fact that we need certain vitamins that we can only get from animals seems to point to the fact that it is part of our natural diet. By "natural diet" I'm saying the diet we ate as our bodies were evolving. Omega-3 fatty acids and DHA are in fish that scientists think helped our brains become as intelligent as they are today. Maybe all of our philosophical discussion is because our ancestors were fishermen and fisherwomen. Maybe a vegetarian diet isn't natural if it must be supplemented with modern pills. If it were natural, we wouldn't need any supplements for maximum health, right? Through my research, I've read that our bodies are exactly as they were 40,000 years ago, before agriculture came along. I just want to know what everyone else thinks of this. Perhaps its true, but maybe our health isn't as important as the lives of animals. Like I asked soilman, where do you draw the line here?<br><br><br><br><a href="http://www.beyondveg.com" target="_blank">www.beyondveg.com</a><br><br><br><br><a href="http://www.beyondveg.com/cat/paleodiet/index.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.beyondveg.com/cat/paleodiet/index.shtml</a><br><br><br><br>
brake 4 squirrels
brake 4 squirrels