This may be in the wrong section. Feel free to move it.
Oh, thank you for this. I wish I'd thought of that years ago...:shifty:If I didn't have meat-eating friends I would have no real-world friends at all. You don't have to feel respect for their dietary choices, though if you were ever a meat-eater yourself you surely get how they feel: Their way is the cultural norm they've always known, around which their life-long habits have formed; the default assumption is that this is the way it is and the way it will always be. You don't have to feel respect because nobody gets to tell you how to feel, but you do have to give respect if you still want their friendship. On FaceBook I do push back against stupid jokes and comments on vegetarians and vegans, but it's always in context of why I do what I do, not why they should change what they do. Nearly always. I'll respond to a joke with a joke: there's an idiot meme going around about how vegetarians live nine long, useless, horrible bacon-less years longer than meat-eaters. This is actually a pretty good friend, and in my response I offered to run the falafel station at the buffet after his funeral.
You know someone will never change their diet. And you have to respect that.Or. other people who are not veggies have to respect our lifestyle. Everything is in tolerance.Hi everyone--
I was having a discussion with a friend earlier about how meat-eating exacerbates the problems associated with global warming/climate change. We also discussed ethical issues with regards to how animals are treated.
He agreed that fighting climate change was urgent and that animal agriculture was a significant contributor, and that animals were generally treated terribly within the factory farm system.
But he then gave a general "meh" answer about changing his diet, which consists of lots and lots of red meat.
For some reason, I got really mad about this (this was a Facebook chat, not in-person chat). I don't understand someone who agrees that eating meat (particularly factory-farmed meat) is terrible both environmentally and ethically, but then is completely uninterested in doing anything at all to help solve the problem and sort of shrugs his shoulders.
I just don't understand the disconnect sometimes.
Sorry to come off a bit angry. Anyway, thanks for reading this and letting me vent a little.
Actually no, that's not true. Imo, it's like saying we should tolerate that pedophilia and slavery are right for some people.You know someone will never change their diet. And you have to respect that.Or. other people who are not veggies have to respect our lifestyle. Everything is in tolerance.
I read an article on the psychology of someone understanding how meat eating is erroneous on several different levels, the reasons are rationally compelling for so many reasons, and yet this logic only works on a certain kind of person. Everyone else is actually more convinced by visceral impact, not even "leading by example" (though sure that works on a different sort of person)...the visceral route is the most effective en masse.This is such a common scenario. People are very attached to their routines and traditions, and food is so personal, they will come up with any reason to defend eating meat. When someone is aware of the problems with animal agriculture, that is pretty much all you can do. You can't make a change for them; they have to decide in their own time. Maybe they will never change, or maybe they will be the people who need a more perfect meat/dairy/egg substitute before they can finally stop eating animals.
If you want to stay friends with this person, I would suggest you agree to disagree. You can always lead by example and show them how easy it is to be vegan -- bring them vegan treats or have them over for a vegan meal.