<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-friedrich/why-leather-is-a-progress_b_47414.html" target="_blank">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-...s_b_47414.html</a><br><br><i><br><br>
The Green Issue of Vanity Fair, currently on shelves, correctly notes in discussing the impact of our purchasing decisions that "fur and leather...mean slaughtering animals," but in an issue packed with otherwise thoughtful analysis, they missed the fact that in addition to the sad fact that wearing fur or leather means, literally, wearing a part of an animal's corpse (or many of them, if you're wearing a full length fur), both products have adverse environmental impacts that far outpace their faux fur and pleather (i.e., faux leather) counterparts.<br><br><br><br>
It's an odd irony, isn't it? You think of leather or fur and you think "natural product." You think of faux fur or faux leather and you think "unnatural," or even "petrochemical." But once you investigate what goes into creating this "natural" (dead) product, whether you're talking about fur or leather, you're talking environmental nightmare that far outpaces the synthetic alternatives......</i><br><br><br><br>
If the issue of the abuse that the poor cattle of China and India suffer in order to meet the demand for leather , isn't enough, consider the effect of leather production on the environment.<br><br><br><br><br><br><a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/01/eco-friendly_leather.php" target="_blank">http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008...ly_leather.php</a><br><br><br><br><i>In all, around 250 chemicals are used in tanning, with chromium sulfate being the most dangerous. Other chemicals include alcohol, coal tar, degreasing agents, dyes, emulsifiers, formaldehyde, formic acid, lead, lime, resin blenders, sodium chloride, sodium sulfate, sulfuric acid, waxes, and zinc. Skins are transferred from vat to vat, soaked and treated and dyed.</i>