I have to agree. Though it's still interesting, even from that perspective.Originally Posted by nigel
I think the matter has more to do with wealth and access to information than any kind of cause and effect.
They claim it's statistically significant.I'd also question the level of confidence we should have in the study - seriously - how many vegans are you going to get out of 8,000 people? By the rates I can find they had around 40 vegetarians and 2 vegans. Hardly enough to warrant even a suggestion.