<div class="quote-container"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>Sevenseas</strong> <a href="/forum/post/0"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif" style=""></a><br><br>
Yeah well I wasn't defending Gita's view or attacking religion, just commenting on Einstein.<br><br><br><br>
I personally think, though, that although Gita has said some offensive things in the past (like veganism being "dangerous"), that comment wasn't particularly questionable. But I'm coming from an agnostic perspective so maybe that's why it's hard for me to see it.</div>
</div>
<br><br><br>
Yeah, I was trying to think of an analogy that would explain why I became upset because I thought I might be questioned on that. But any analogy I thought of seemed to just bring up more contentious subjects that would further take this thread in a direction not intended by the OP. I didn't find your post offensive because it was only in response to my post.<br><br><br><br>
Gita's post is not really a big deal. Normally I would just ignore such remarks because they come up in all areas of life and sometimes I find that perspective to be funny. As if all of us who believe in heaven see a old bearded man in the sky who brings us up to the pearly gates so we can walk around on golden streets. I'm not sure if anyone believes in that version of heaven.<br><br><br><br>
And that was my point about Einstein: there are those who take the perspective that others who believe in God also believe in a fantasy. But belief in God can be very complex and even among those in a particular religion the belief is varied. The fact that Einstein believes in God may indicate that the belief in God is not just some kind of fantasy belief. Even those who may have a more conventional understanding of God find it difficult to explain what they believe in:<br><br><br><br><div class="quote-container"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Saint Thomas Aquinas was one of the greatest theologians and philosophers of the Christian church. Saint Thomas is called the <i>Angelic Doctor</i>...<br><br><br><br>
His two greatest works are <i>Summa contra Gentiles</i> and <i>Summa Theologica</i>...<br><br><br><br>
Aquinas stopped work on [a third document of Summa Theologica] in 1273, when he came to believe all he had written was "like so much straw compared with what I have seen and what has been revealed to me."<br><br><br><br>
-- World Book Encyclopedia</div>
</div>
<br><br><br><br><br>
But live and learn I say. And yesterday I did both. I have never really looked into pantheism and yesterday I took the time to look into it a bit and what I found was that the teachings of pantheism and the teaching of Jesus are not necessarily in opposition. So I'm not surprised to find aspects of pantheism has been taught by some Christians:<br><br><br><br><div class="quote-container"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">There is pantheism in the teachings of the Neoplatonists and of such Christian philosophers as Erigena, John Scotus and such mystics as Eckhart and Boehme.</div>
</div>
<br><br><br><a href="http://columbia.thefreedictionary.com/Scientific+Panthiest" target="_blank">http://columbia.thefreedictionary.co...ific+Panthiest</a><br><br><br><br>
I also did some reading here: <a href="http://friesian.com/spinoza.htm" target="_blank">http://friesian.com/spinoza.htm</a><br><br><br><br>
And what does all this have to do with the OP? In essense: nothing. This is a discussion that should take place in another thread. <img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/smiley.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title="

"> I realize that what I write sometimes may be condescending and dismissive but I try to fit those perspectives into the proper threads instead of trying to slip them into threads that have nothing to do with the subject at hand.