<a href="http://www.cspinet.org/new/200302201.html" target="_blank">http://www.cspinet.org/new/200302201.html</a><br><br><br><br>
This article is from the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a fairly unbiased source.
Well I would argue that CSPI is pretty biased on this issue since they were the ones that filed the lawsuit, but I have read about this elsewhere and saw a link once to the legal documents. I will try to remember where I saw this.<br><br><br><br>
OK, here is a link to the legal stuff<br><br><a href="http://www.arbitration-forum.com/domains/decisions/128796.htm." target="_blank">http://www.arbitration-forum.com/dom...ns/128796.htm.</a><br><br>
Thanks for the link (a "." ended up at the end of the URL - remove it to make the link work). CSPI does have their own biases, like all non-profit orgs, but they aren't quite as biased as, say, a vegetarian advocacy group. (I'm biased toward veg orgs myself, but other people are biased against them.)
A forum community dedicated to vegetarian, vegans, and vegetable enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about agriculture, preparation, cooking, recipes, scales, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!