VeggieBoards banner
1 - 1 of 1 Posts

· Registered
9,132 Posts
Originally Posted by silva View Post

Animal testing is done more for liability than for any real need.
The example given was not for liability reasons, and not government mandated. It was just for students to see a heart attack or other effect of a drug. This wasn't a research experiment but a demonstration.

Alternatives to this one? Read a book, or watch a video of someone having a heart attack or other effect of increased hormone production. There was no need at all for any animal to die for that class.

I'm scared to have any health professional who thinks that's o.k. take care of me. I think that shows a kind of sociopathic indifference to suffering.
1 - 1 of 1 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.