Polygamy - VeggieBoards
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#1 Old 04-18-2008, 01:19 PM
Veggie Regular
 
gillibean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,794
I'm curious about how others feel on this issue. I recently got evil eye from my fiance for saying I want marriage to simply be defined as a civil union of 2 or more people.



ETA I should add that I'm curious because I've never been around people who are open minded enough to give it some honest thought. Baptists made of the vast majority of my friends and family for most of my life.
gillibean is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 Old 04-18-2008, 01:28 PM
Veggie Regular
 
IamJen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,134
<<gets some popcorn and finds the comfy chair.......




The ones I pity are the ones who never stick out their neck for something they believe, never know the taste of moral struggle, and never have the thrill of victory. - Jonathan Kozol
IamJen is offline  
#3 Old 04-18-2008, 01:49 PM
Veggie Regular
 
lefty2026's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 369
I think that is a perfectly good definition.



I never understand why people care what consenting adults do.



If I could have a husband and a wife - that would be awesome.
lefty2026 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#4 Old 04-18-2008, 01:50 PM
Beginner
 
halo_zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 160
Depends. Are the women allowed to grow up in a stable environment, free to make their own choices? Are they not indoctrinated and brainwashed from birth with disgusting pseudo-religious ideals that basically amount to giving men a "god given right" to being pedophiles?



If it's multiple men married to a woman . . . well . . . I think that woman is probably pretty unlucky fending off cheesey advances left and right all day long. That would have to get extremely tiring.
halo_zero is offline  
#5 Old 04-18-2008, 02:14 PM
Veggie Regular
 
Sevenseas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 25,067
People can live in a network of five thousand people, sticking pineapples in each other's orifices, for all I care. It's just not for me.

"and I stand

upon a mountain

made of weak and useless men"

Sevenseas is offline  
#6 Old 04-18-2008, 02:31 PM
Newbie
 
GhostUser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by halo_zero View Post

Depends. Are the women allowed to grow up in a stable environment, free to make their own choices? Are they not indoctrinated and brainwashed from birth with disgusting pseudo-religious ideals that basically amount to giving men a "god given right" to being pedophiles?



If it's multiple men married to a woman . . . well . . . I think that woman is probably pretty unlucky fending off cheesey advances left and right all day long. That would have to get extremely tiring.



What about men who are indoctrinated and brain-washed from birth to believe that they are put on the earth only to provide money and and make 'cheesy advances' towards women for the purpose of breeding so that the women can emotionally abuse and financially ruin men using their children as bargaining chips?



If it is multiple women married to a man...well...I think that man is pretty unlucky to have to tolerate incessant nagging and crying. That would have to get extremely tiring.
GhostUser is offline  
#7 Old 04-18-2008, 02:33 PM
Veggie Regular
 
kazyeeqen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by halo_zero View Post

Depends. Are the women allowed to grow up in a stable environment, free to make their own choices? Are they not indoctrinated and brainwashed from birth with disgusting pseudo-religious ideals that basically amount to giving men a "god given right" to being pedophiles?



If it's multiple men married to a woman . . . well . . . I think that woman is probably pretty unlucky fending off cheesey advances left and right all day long. That would have to get extremely tiring.



I would assume it wouldn't be that one person is the focus of all the attention in the relationship, that would be unhealthy for everyone.
kazyeeqen is offline  
#8 Old 04-18-2008, 02:34 PM
Veggie Regular
 
gillibean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by kazyeeqen View Post

I would assume it wouldn't be that one person is the focus of all the attention in the relationship, that would be unhealthy for everyone.



I'm sure there would be some like that but as long as it doesn't escalate into abuse, that's their problem.
gillibean is offline  
#9 Old 04-18-2008, 02:36 PM
Veggie Regular
 
kazyeeqen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by gillibean View Post

I'm sure there would be some like that but as long as it doesn't escalate into abuse, that's their problem.



Yeah, I suppose so.
kazyeeqen is offline  
#10 Old 04-18-2008, 02:39 PM
Veggie Regular
 
Savannah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sevenseas View Post

People can live in a network of five thousand people, sticking pineapples in each other's orifices, for all I care. It's just not for me.



is this some strange practice on the part of radical fruitarians?
Savannah is offline  
#11 Old 04-18-2008, 02:48 PM
Beginner
 
halo_zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sketchy View Post

What about men who are indoctrinated and brain-washed from birth to believe that they are put on the earth only to provide money and and make 'cheesy advances' towards women for the purpose of breeding so that the women can emotionally abuse and financially ruin men using their children as bargaining chips?



If it is multiple women married to a man...well...I think that man is pretty unlucky to have to tolerate incessant nagging and crying. That would have to get extremely tiring.



We men have a choice to decide whether or not we want to put up with that sort of behavior. The girls/women in the polygamist camps do not.



Men that put up with not being respected are not victims. They can be victims of the system in some cases with child support/custody though, agreed. This is an entirely different subject than polygamy. If you want to talk about how the past 40 years have created massive shifts in how masculinity is perceived, and how masculinity is looked down upon in many ways in our society, I'm open to discussing that elsewhere
halo_zero is offline  
#12 Old 04-18-2008, 03:45 PM
Beginner
 
taryn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 148
I think people should do whatever the hell they want as long as they don't hurt themselves or others.



A lot of relationships with one man and one woman are sexist, and I don't think that polygymous relationship would be MORE sexist or oppressive. Actually, in certain societies, women prefer being in a polygynous relationship because they are able to split a lot of their work.



And why do men always think that the women would be only interested in the husband? huh?
taryn is offline  
#13 Old 04-18-2008, 04:04 PM
Veggie Regular
 
codemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,511
I think that legally, marriage should be a contract between two or more consenting adults. Sex with a minor should never be legal. Forcing someone into marriage should never be legal. Abuse should never be legal. Because polygamy is illegal, those people are forced to live off-the-grid and it makes law enforcement have a MUCH harder time detecting abuse. If a polygamous man can legally only have one wife, his other "wives" are legally single mothers and are eligible for welfare, no matter how much money their "husband" makes because they're not legally married. If polygamy were legal, it would close that loophole. If people want to have multiple spouses and even raise children in families with multiple mothers (or fathers or both), that doesn't bother me at all as long as everyone involved is okay with it.



I'm a religious person and would never choose to live that lifestyle. But I don't think it should be illegal for someone else to follow their religious (or personal) beliefs just because it doesn't agree with my own religious beliefs, as long as they don't hurt someone else or infringe on another person's rights. Last time I checked, we were supposed to have freedom of religion in America.



I'm a pretty conservative person but it pisses me off when the government tells me which consenting adult I should be able to marry or have sex with (even though I'm in a "normal" heterosexual marriage).
codemonkey is offline  
#14 Old 04-18-2008, 04:31 PM
Beginner
 
halo_zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by codemonkey View Post

I think that legally, marriage should be a contract between two or more consenting adults. Sex with a minor should never be legal. Forcing someone into marriage should never be legal. Abuse should never be legal. Because polygamy is illegal, those people are forced to live off-the-grid and it makes law enforcement have a MUCH harder time detecting abuse. If a polygamous man can legally only have one wife, his other "wives" are legally single mothers and are eligible for welfare, no matter how much money their "husband" makes because they're not legally married. If polygamy were legal, it would close that loophole. If people want to have multiple spouses and even raise children in families with multiple mothers (or fathers or both), that doesn't bother me at all as long as everyone involved is okay with it.



I'm a religious person and would never choose to live that lifestyle. But I don't think it should be illegal for someone else to follow their religious (or personal) beliefs just because it doesn't agree with my own religious beliefs, as long as they don't hurt someone else or infringe on another person's rights. Last time I checked, we were supposed to have freedom of religion in America.



I'm a pretty conservative person but it pisses me off when the government tells me which consenting adult I should be able to marry or have sex with (even though I'm in a "normal" heterosexual marriage).



halo_zero is offline  
#15 Old 04-18-2008, 04:35 PM
Veggie Regular
 
WonderRandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,591
Are we talking about polygamy, or the recent raids on Jeffers' compound?



They aren't necessarily the same you know...

Nec Aspera Terrent
WonderRandy is offline  
#16 Old 04-18-2008, 04:38 PM
Veggie Regular
 
gillibean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by WonderRandy View Post

Are we talking about polygamy, or the recent raids on Jeffers' compound?



They aren't necessarily the same you know...



I started this thread solely on polygamy. I'd forgotten all about the raids actually.
gillibean is offline  
#17 Old 04-18-2008, 04:40 PM
Veggie Regular
 
codemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,511
A lot of people use what happens on those compounds as an arguement against polygamy but I think plural marriage and abuse are totally separate issues. There's plenty of abuse in "traditional" families so I think it's an invalid arguement.
codemonkey is offline  
#18 Old 04-18-2008, 05:42 PM
Kiz
Veggie Regular
 
Kiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,132
I have nothing against polygamy/polyandry/polygyny, and think they should both/all be legal. Nothing I'd ever touch myself, I like the one-on-one thing, but if people want to go for it who am I to stop them? Forcing people into any kind of marriage against their will, whether polygamous or not, in an entirely different issue.

Love the post? Why not buy the T-shirt!
http://www.kiz-shop.de/index.php?page=categorie&cat=8
http://www.kiz-shop.de/index.php?page=product&info=94
Kiz is offline  
#19 Old 04-18-2008, 05:50 PM
Ankle Biter
 
Poppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Central Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,333
I don't see anything wrong with polygamy in theory.

It is our choices that show what we truly are far more than our abilities. ~A. Dumbledore
Poppy is offline  
#20 Old 04-18-2008, 06:10 PM
Veggie Regular
 
Irizary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,743
I don't see why anyone should even care what adults choose to do with other consenting adults.

"If you want to know where you would have stood on slavery before the civil war, don't look at where you stand on slavery today, look at where you stand on animal rights." - Paul Watson.

 

Every animal you eat
was running for her life

Irizary is offline  
#21 Old 04-18-2008, 06:14 PM
Veggie Regular
 
gillibean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irizary View Post

I don't see why anyone should even care what adults choose to do with other consenting adults.



Neither do I, but being surrounded by extreme conservatives my whole life was starting to make me wonder if I was the crazy one for liberal views.
gillibean is offline  
#22 Old 04-18-2008, 06:15 PM
Kiz
Veggie Regular
 
Kiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,132
There are legal ramifications and complications that could arise when, say, one member wants a divorce from one person but not the others, from the group, distribution of goods upon a split, how life insurance works, child payments etc etc etc. I can see we do need to look at these sort of legal aspects, just as we need to look at the legal aspects of any such partnership. This is more than just a moral choice after all. It's a practical one.

Love the post? Why not buy the T-shirt!
http://www.kiz-shop.de/index.php?page=categorie&cat=8
http://www.kiz-shop.de/index.php?page=product&info=94
Kiz is offline  
#23 Old 04-18-2008, 06:16 PM
Veggie Regular
 
gillibean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,794
The logistical aspects give me a headache so I let other people worry about them.
gillibean is offline  
#24 Old 04-18-2008, 06:23 PM
Newbie
 
melancholy024's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 38
I personally don't understand why anyone would want more than one spouse. Not for any of the legal reasons, but for the psychological ones. I think my drama gland would burst in such a situation. Who's doing what to or with whom and why is that and who did this. I would scream...
melancholy024 is offline  
#25 Old 04-19-2008, 12:41 AM
Banned
 
Hang~Ten~Honey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by melancholy024 View Post

I personally don't understand why anyone would want more than one spouse.



There are as many reasons as there are people who choose more than one partner. I've been in such a relationship and I'd be in one again if/when I/We find another person to love. Although I do believe it works better when all parties are fully engaged in a loving, intimate relationship with one another... meaning that all men and women within the relationship are in love, sexually attracted to each other, are there by choice and the relationship is one of equal partnership and commitment (i.e. NO children allowed).





The FDLS is just an excuse to rape children and commit incest.









Kiz, those problems exist now with domestic partnerships because there are so few laws regarding non-married couples. I think this is where legal written contracts and documents come into play (i.e Wills, Advanced Directives, other estate planning, child custody docs, etc). It does seem confusing but look at the mess hetero married couples often get themselves into when divorcing, etc. The process of love is just messy and complicated.
Hang~Ten~Honey is offline  
#26 Old 04-19-2008, 12:58 AM
Kiz
Veggie Regular
 
Kiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,132
Love and marriage are not necessarily always related.

Love the post? Why not buy the T-shirt!
http://www.kiz-shop.de/index.php?page=categorie&cat=8
http://www.kiz-shop.de/index.php?page=product&info=94
Kiz is offline  
#27 Old 04-19-2008, 04:44 AM
Bof
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiz View Post

Love and marriage are not necessarily always related.



I thought they went together like a horse and carriage.

(Not that I approve of equine enslavement. )
Bof is offline  
#28 Old 04-19-2008, 04:25 PM
Veggie Regular
 
Jennifer N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 478
Are we talking about people having multiple marriages, or a marriage having more than two people at the same time, or both?



While I am poly, I'm legally bound to my partner, for financial and legal security. I don't think I'd want him or me to be in a legally binding situation with another person as well (i.e. he has me, and also has a separate marriage-thingy with another person, which I am not a part of). I don't want to have to fight a ***** for his life insurance when he croaks.



I'd be more open to the idea of adding a third person to our union, but I seriously doubt we'll find someone compatible. Our relationship is intense, to the point of being a little unhealthy. I doubt we'd be able to share each other to that extent with another person.



Of course, this is my opinion regarding my own personal situation. As always, I don't give a crap what other people do. I am not morally opposed to either situation, or to a traditional marriage for that matter.
Jennifer N is offline  
#29 Old 04-19-2008, 04:32 PM
Veggie Regular
 
gillibean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jennifer N View Post

Are we talking about people having multiple marriages, or a marriage having more than two people at the same time, or both?





I was thinking along the lines of a singular marriage with multiple partners (does that make sense?) than something like you have. People having multiple marriages seems like a very precarious state to be in. I think that there would be more potential for abuse if the partners of the single person had no say over the their partner is involved in. I've been smelling ammonia and bleach all day so it's possible I'm delusional and making so sense whatsoever.
gillibean is offline  
#30 Old 04-19-2008, 04:52 PM
Kiz
Veggie Regular
 
Kiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,132
Both are being discussed, I'm assuming. I'm mostly thinking along the lines of gillibean as well, though, minus ammonia and bleach.

Love the post? Why not buy the T-shirt!
http://www.kiz-shop.de/index.php?page=categorie&cat=8
http://www.kiz-shop.de/index.php?page=product&info=94
Kiz is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the VeggieBoards forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off