or Connect
VeggieBoards › Forums › Vegetarian Forums › Vegetarian Support Forum › PETA superbowl ad "Too sexy"
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

PETA superbowl ad "Too sexy"

post #1 of 252
Thread Starter 
Quote:
American television network NBC has refused to air a Super Bowl advertisement from the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals featuring scantily clad models handling vegetables.



Victoria Morgan, NBC Universal's advertising standards executive, said the advert "depicts a level of sexuality exceeding our standards".



NBC asked the organisation to edit some of the racy scenes out of the ad but Peta refused.



"Apparently, NBC has something against girls who love their veggies," wrote blogger Amy Elizabeth on Peta's website.



I've heard the reports that vegetarians have better sex, which is the focus of the ad.



Never heard that Vegetarians have better sex! They should still run the ad, clearly NBC has no "taste".
post #2 of 252
Yeah. I guess they felt the "completely-accidental-not-premeditated-at-all-to-attract-publicity" Janet Jackson tittyslip was a little more wholesome and family friendly.
post #3 of 252
I highly doubt PETA had any intention of showing an ad during the Super Bowl and made an ad they knew would be refused because they know it'll get posted all over the web.



They do the same thing every year.



http://blog.peta.org/archives/2008/0...to_fox_wtf.php
Follow me on Twitter - @_jorts
Reply
Follow me on Twitter - @_jorts
Reply
post #4 of 252
PETA knew before they even tried to buy the airtime that the ad would be too racy. That's why they made it. They do this consistently. Make over-the-top racy ads (billboards, tv ads, print ads) that they know will never be aired/printed so that they can get news time with the "PETA add to hot to show." Because once they do that people will flock to the website to see what the "big deal" is. They get more exposure by making ads that won't be run than by making ads that will actually be run.



It's simple business. PETA does this intentionally.



"News" would actually be PETA making an ad that could/would be run in a magazine or on tv. This isn't news it's business as usual for PETA.
I am the user formerly known as MrsKey
Reply
I am the user formerly known as MrsKey
Reply
post #5 of 252
I, for one, am consistently annoyed by PETA's sexist advertising. It really annoys me that they need naked (extremely thin, "beautiful" by western society standards) women to make their point. (My apologies if the "scantily clad models" referred to in the ad were actually men)



It seems to me somewhat hypocritical to advocate against using animals as mere means while simultaneously treating women in this way.
post #6 of 252
I heard about this earlier. From the description of the commercial it sounds ridiculous and disgusting. I'm sorry but PETA annoys me as well. I get that sex sells but c'mon. You can get the veggie message across without using naked women or commercials depicting beautiful women practically having sex with vegetables/or getting aroused by them (thats the description I heard anyways). There were comments from people that have seen it that said if anything it turned them off to eating vegetables.
post #7 of 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael View Post

I highly doubt PETA had any intention of showing an ad during the Super Bowl and made an ad they knew would be refused because they know it'll get posted all over the web.



They do the same thing every year.



http://blog.peta.org/archives/2008/0...to_fox_wtf.php



Yup, and they don't have to pay the network millions of dollars.
post #8 of 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by fadeaway1289 View Post

I heard about this earlier. From the description of the commercial it sounds ridiculous and disgusting. I'm sorry but PETA annoys me as well. I get that sex sells but c'mon. You can get the veggie message across without using naked women or commercials depicting beautiful women practically having sex with vegetables/or getting aroused by them (thats the description I heard anyways). There were comments from people that have seen it that said if anything it turned them off to eating vegetables.



It was, in my opinion, anything but sexy. And pretty much the way you described it. Not, again in my opinion, a great endorsement for vegetarian living. Just another sexist publicity stunt in which PETA uses nearly naked women.
I am the user formerly known as MrsKey
Reply
I am the user formerly known as MrsKey
Reply
post #9 of 252
I'm not comfortable with PETA's tendency to objectify women either. I also am not comfortable with the way that I think a lot of people have double standards concerning what objectification they object to. Omnis for example participate in objectification every day with their choices, but they present themselves as somehow progressive in their thinking when they get to criticize PETA.

"and I stand

upon a mountain

made of weak and useless men"

Reply

"and I stand

upon a mountain

made of weak and useless men"

Reply
post #10 of 252
Here's the ad for those who are curious. It's slightly worse than a Victoria's Secret ad so if those offend you you might want to skip it altogether.



Not safe for work!



[youtube]5GJiIXn87BQ[/youtube]
Follow me on Twitter - @_jorts
Reply
Follow me on Twitter - @_jorts
Reply
post #11 of 252
Maybe the reason I don't like this ad is because my mom always taught me not to play with my food.
I am the user formerly known as MrsKey
Reply
I am the user formerly known as MrsKey
Reply
post #12 of 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sevenseas View Post

I'm not comfortable with PETA's tendency to objectify women either. I also am not comfortable with the way that I think a lot of people have double standards concerning what objectification they object to. Omnis for example participate in objectification every day with their choices, but they present themselves as somehow progressive in their thinking when they get to criticize PETA.



Because adult women are choosing - often freely volunteering - to be in ads for PETA, I generally don't agree with this line of criticizing PETA. I don't see adult women as helpless victims of representation.



In what way is advertising generally "exploiting" people through representation? It's always exploiting some human feature or endeavor.

"If you want to know where you would have stood on slavery before the civil war, don't look at where you stand on slavery today, look at where you stand on animal rights." - Paul Watson.

 

Every animal you eat
was running for her life

Reply

"If you want to know where you would have stood on slavery before the civil war, don't look at where you stand on slavery today, look at where you stand on animal rights." - Paul Watson.

 

Every animal you eat
was running for her life

Reply
post #13 of 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irizary View Post

Because adult women are choosing - often freely volunteering - to be in ads for PETA, I generally don't agree with this line of criticizing PETA. I don't see adult women as helpless victims of representation.

Well I think this counter-argument is a defense for advertising accused of sexism generally: whether the ads are for beer, cars or "male fragrance", the women probably are in them voluntarily.



I would personally rather use the criticism against PETA as a springboard for attacking the objectification a lot of omnis engage in, than to become an unintentional apologist for, say, Axe.



Quote:
In what way is advertising generally "exploiting" people through representation? It's always exploiting some human feature or endeavor.

I would submit that such human features as e.g. a sense of humor, intelligence or athletic skill are not surrounded by societal problems that would be even close to those surrounding women's bodies.

"and I stand

upon a mountain

made of weak and useless men"

Reply

"and I stand

upon a mountain

made of weak and useless men"

Reply
post #14 of 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irizary View Post

Because adult women are choosing - often freely volunteering - to be in ads for PETA, I generally don't agree with this line of criticizing PETA. I don't see adult women as helpless victims of representation.



In what way is advertising generally "exploiting" people through representation? It's always exploiting some human feature or endeavor.



Just because the women volunteered to be in the ad doesn't mean that the ad doesn't objectify women...
post #15 of 252
Thanks Michael. It's hard to believe that particular advertisement is even effective.
post #16 of 252
PETA: Trying to make animals' lives better by treating women like meat.



Seriously, there are more tasteful ways to depict the message "Vegetarians have better sex" than making this look like a Penthouse magazine. It would be better if there was a man in the commercial looking hot too, but the message I get from this ad is women=ready and willing for sex all the time, even with asparagus.
post #17 of 252
Thread Starter 
Quote:
but the message I get from this ad is women=ready and willing for sex all the time, even with asparagus.



I get the impression that vegetarian women are hawt....but in reality...
post #18 of 252
Seems like a "fitting" superbowl ad, but I hardly see how it would be effective.
post #19 of 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by OilPatch197 View Post

I get the impression that vegetarian women are hawt....but in reality...



We are too hawt! Even we old ones. (I used to drive a red Porsche)
post #20 of 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by OilPatch197 View Post

I get the impression that vegetarian women are hawt....but in reality...



OilPatch197
post #21 of 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by m4rk0 View Post

OilPatch197

He/she/whatever hands out some real gems.

"and I stand

upon a mountain

made of weak and useless men"

Reply

"and I stand

upon a mountain

made of weak and useless men"

Reply
post #22 of 252
I don't really have any reaction to that ad other than and possibly
post #23 of 252
I hope no one is drawing conclusions about the "hawtness" of vegetarian woman based on PETA models. PETA's record for choosing actual vegetarians to represent them in the media is notoriously bad.
www.thesaucyvegan.com
Reply
www.thesaucyvegan.com
Reply
post #24 of 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by dormouse View Post

PETA: Trying to make animals' lives better by treating women like meat.



Oh Dormouse, your saying always get me

I totally agree with this though!
post #25 of 252
I doubt a single person will become a vegetarian because of this add. It's ridiculous.
post #26 of 252
Didn't really notice the women, but the veggies were hawt.
post #27 of 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by OilPatch197 View Post

I get the impression that vegetarian women are hawt....but in reality...



Hey, man....I mean, I know I don't walk around my house in lingerie or fellate cucumbers, but I think I'm kinda hot....
post #28 of 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sevenseas View Post

Well I think this counter-argument is a defense for advertising accused of sexism generally: whether the ads are for beer, cars or "male fragrance", the women probably are in them voluntarily.



I think the argument does have some merit, in that, as far as I know, it's usually women who want to promote vegetarianism, whereas for most ads, it's actors who need money. Any actor I know needs money. Unless they're a big name, they'll take nearly any job they can.



However, I agree; the objectification is ridiculous. Why not just have the people talking honestly about vegetarianism? I know the mantra in advertising is that honesty won't sell, but then look at Barack Obama (sidenote: I'm now jealous of Americans; so far, your leader could kick our leader's butt. Easily.). He's all about honesty, and look where it got him?



This is rambling and unfocused...but yeah, I agree. Objectification is ridiculous. There's a Bell commercial here that has been annoying me lately, with a guy who hires a bunch of cheerleaders to cheer while he talks to his (male) buddy about getting Bell. They're completely treated like objects. Nothing more. They get screen time for their cheers. And they're completely irrelevant otherwise.
post #29 of 252
I hope the next guy I date doesn't see this and think I'll try to seduce him with a pumpkin.



Actually, like most things, it made me think of an xkcd cartoon.

http://xkcd.com/236/
post #30 of 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by martino View Post

I think the argument does have some merit, in that, as far as I know, it's usually women who want to promote vegetarianism, whereas for most ads, it's actors who need money. Any actor I know needs money. Unless they're a big name, they'll take nearly any job they can.

Do you mean that limited economic opportunities limit the voluntariness of women being in the usual ads? I think that may be true, but analogously to that I would argue that the gender roles in our society limit the voluntariness of how the women in PETA's ads choose to express themselves.



'Voluntary', when not taken in the crude "no one put a gun to your head" sense, is a complex notion.

"and I stand

upon a mountain

made of weak and useless men"

Reply

"and I stand

upon a mountain

made of weak and useless men"

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Vegetarian Support Forum
VeggieBoards › Forums › Vegetarian Forums › Vegetarian Support Forum › PETA superbowl ad "Too sexy"