Originally Posted by remilard
we can stop when you agree that it is logically inconsistent to be more angry at someone who crushed one kitten than someone who is responsible for the killing (sometimes slow) of several hundred chickens.
We can stop what? Pointing out words instead of the issue?
Well given that fact that I do not know anyone person who has chosen to kill a chicken that way I can not say I am angry at them.
However just because they eat a chicken and are ignorant of the way the chicken died does not make me one bit upset, they did not kill the chicken someone else did and as long as it was killed in a humane manner I have no issues either. If you are wondering I support the death penalty and right to die and abortion just in case your wondering if I extend my killing ways to humans as well.
Crushing a kitten ( or chicken or hell a snake) to death is in IMO a whole differant ball park than simply killing an animal in a quick and as painless as possible way.
I know full well what can go on inside a chicken factory but I am not partaking of it and even if my 6 year old eats a chicken leg she was not in there killing a chicken so she ( nor any other omni) is to blame for how the chicken was killed.
They may be in part blamed for the chickens death because if they didnt eat it then it might still be alive but few people who eat meat would want an animal killed in any type of slow painful way.
This kitten was not being used for food or anything other than someones rather perverted pleasure, the animals death was a waste and not just a waste it was slow and painful.
See my issue is not with death itself but how death is handed out and if death had a viable reason, food is viable, getting off sexualy is not.