You are viewing the VeggieBoards archive.
To view the regular site or join please click here.


PDA

View Full Version : Cover Girl


Kay9
05-18-06, 09:10 AM
I stupidly assumed that makeup co.s don't test on animals anymore until I read somewhere that Cover Girl (my fav brand, almost all my makeup is CG) tests on animals! I went on their website and got this. I don't understand it. Do they test on animals or what? I was hoping one of you could decifer it for me.


P&G has ended research involving animals on all our finished consumer products except when required by law. We use non-animal alternatives first. We'll only use animal testing when there are no other reasonable options.

In our Healthcare business, we're focused on developing innovative medicines that improve people's lives. Current regulatory standards require animal research while developing these medications. It's our policy to use the minimum number of animals necessary while working toward our goal of the reduction and replacement of animals. We continue to identify screening techniques that are acceptable to global regulatory groups to take the place of animal tests in the earliest phase of drug discovery.

Through our pet care and nutrition products, we help dogs and cats live longer, healthier lives. We feed our foods first to dogs and cats to help us develop nutrition that delivers true health benefits to millions of pets worldwide. We make sure the dogs and cats we work with receive the best care. We treat them as if they're our own pets. They are adopted into loving homes or placed in our retirement facility when their help is no longer needed. At the same time, we're working hard on alternatives to find even better ways of getting these results and eliminating the need for additional research with other animals.

We'd rather use alternative test methods. Not only is the use of animals avoided, but reliable alternative tests generally cost less and take less time than animal research. We'd like to be able to eliminate animal research on ingredients in consumer products altogether, and we're making progress. We've invested over $190 million in alternatives, making us an industry leader. We've helped develop over 50 alternative methods and have shared our work in over 300 scientific publications. We're also working with the FDA and respected animal welfare groups, such as the Humane Society of the United States, to work on reforming regulations and validating alternative methods. To learn more, check out our website at http://www.pg.com/science/animal_alt.jhtml

SallyK
05-18-06, 12:18 PM
As far as I am aware, no testing of (finished) cosmetics or skin care is required by the FDA, so P&G may have ended those tests. However, Cover Girl contains some pretty icky ingredients IMO, so watch out.

Trueveggie14
05-18-06, 12:26 PM
No animal testing on finished product still allows them to test every single ingredient on animals!!!

janie
05-18-06, 12:31 PM
"P&G has ended research involving animals on all our finished consumer products except when required by law. We use non-animal alternatives first. We'll only use animal testing when there are no other reasonable options."

There are reasonable options, Procter & Gamble just doesn't want to use them. I know Cover Girl may be your favorite, but there are so many other companies out there that do not test any of their consumer products/ingredients/raw materials on animals... give them a shot. :)

Susykat
05-18-06, 10:37 PM
P&G has ended research involving animals on all our finished consumer products except when required by law. We use non-animal alternatives first. We'll only use animal testing when there are no other reasonable options.

Note "finished consumer products" - which means that they probably still test the individual ingrdients on animals, which isn't any better really. I avoid P & G like the plague, I will never buy any product made by that company.

Nowhere in the world is it required by law to test cosmetics on animals. While I'm not sure if P & G specifically tests CoverGirl on animals, the fact is that they test many of their other products on animals. The way I see it, if I bought any of their products that they DON'T use in testing, I'd still be supporting a company that tests on animals.

There's a number of commercial cosmetics companies that don't test. I don't have a list, but I use cosmetics by less known, vegan companies.

ikisstrees
05-18-06, 11:32 PM
I used to use Covergirl as well, and what I did was used up what I had left of it, while experimenting with other cruelty-free options. If you want to stay in the same price range, I would try Revlon and I've always wondered if Maybelline tested on animals (I got an unclear animal testing answer from them as well). If you want better quality makeup I would go for Arbonne or Zia, both of which aren't outrageous. PETA has a whole list of companies that don't test on animals, another local one being Physican's Formula. If you want to find out a little more about P & G's "animal testing policies" check out pandgkills.com

Kay9
05-19-06, 06:33 AM
Thanks. I'm going to use bare minerals from now on. They say they don't test on animals on their site. I'll check into Revlon too.

IamJen
05-19-06, 12:49 PM
Yeah. Revlon has stated that they don't test on animals (at least currently, they're calling it a "moratorium"), whereas CG is hedging the issue.

Most of the drugstore brands that don't test say so right on the label. Bonne Bell, Jane, and I think NYC?

Hummusisyummus
05-19-06, 12:54 PM
Companies that don't test on animals are proud of it and usually plainly state "Not tested on animals".

I don't see why they're claiming they're required by law to test on animals. Is it the ingredients they use?

SotallyTober
05-19-06, 01:00 PM
Jane actually stands for the botanical ingredients that are found in most of their products. Juniper, Aloe, Nettle, and Elderflower. Just an interesting fact.

And from their FAQ page:

Does jane test their cosmetics on animals?

Answer: Absolutely not! It's great that you're concerned about animal testing. We had the same concerns, which is why we decided from the very beginning that we would not test our products on animals. Any new ingredient or product developed by jane adheres to our strict no-animal-testing policy.

Of course, we are concerned about product safety. That's why we use human volunteers and rely on the most up-to-date information about formulas and colors to verify our product safety.

bumble
05-20-06, 04:21 PM
Covergirl tests.

Try Revlon or another company.

the_technogoat
05-25-06, 04:47 PM
zuzu luxe foundation works well on my pale, combination/oily skin, and zia makes a long-lasting pressed powder. zuzu luxe eyeliner also works well and is long-lasting. these products are vegan, not tested on animals, are fairly priced, and are composed of very few ingredients.

Egglet11
07-10-08, 03:41 PM
Anyone know if there's an update on this topic? No ones posted in a couple years and I was wondering if CG has gotten their act together yet...

greensgood
07-10-08, 04:51 PM
Seems as if they still do animal testing. The P&G site is very vague about their animal alternatives : http://www.pg.com/science/aa_commitment.jhtml
They claim to not test on products that do not legally require it, yet right after that they say unless it is a new product etc...

What really makes me cringe about Covergirl is their latest spokesmodel...Drew Barrymore! It already really sucked when she publicly stopped being vegetarian and contributed her healthier physique to eating meat...when i see her dancing around for covergirl i wanna pull her hair out!

miserychick
07-12-08, 07:15 PM
^ Yeah, I was very, very disappointed to see Drew as a spokeswoman for Cover Girl. But ya know....$$$$