with this article

http://www.chatelaine.com/foodrecipes/tools/mealplans/article.jsp?content=1078884

:brood:

Um, the vegetarian who lacks protein in her diet? Or the recommendation of the salmon sandwich for lunch? Or both? :think:

*is starting to get really really paranoid and becoming convinced that there are certain twisted people out there who know very well that vegetarians don't eat fish but insist on including fish in vegetarian meal plans as a sneaky way of convincing people that vegetarians DO eat fish and hopefully getting vegetarians to backslide and start eating meat again* :stinkeye:

Both! Oh well, I never liked that magazine anyway.

Did you change my title? No surprises now ... :p

Did you change my title? No surprises now ... :p

I think Michael did that, or a mod.

Nothing is wrong with this.
Salmons grow on trees don't you know & are suitable fare for vegetarians.
Why not also have chicken for dinner as these are vegetarian too.

Michael and the mods are quite serious about enforcing the descriptive title rule. You'll always get slapped with a title edit if you don't make it clear enough. Happens to the best of us.

Back on topic: I HATE that the Moosewood cookbooks always contain fish sections. But to be fair, I'm not sure they actually describe themselves as "vegetarian" cookbooks per se. But seeing how the public seems to consider Moosewood sort of the 'gold standard' of vegetarian fare...

I was the one who changed the title, but Michael would've had he seen it first (it's a bit of a pet peeve with our creator :p )

I sent them a little note reminding them that fish is *not* vegetarian.

ha ha I should do that too.