You are viewing the VeggieBoards archive.
To view the regular site or join please click here.


PDA

View Full Version : Plenty of Food - Yet the Poor are Starving


Pages : [1] 2 3

jbphburg
08-01-05, 04:17 PM
Just horrible, no one anywhere should allowed to starve when there's food to be had.


Published on Monday, August 1, 2005 by the Guardian (UK)
Plenty of Food - Yet the Poor are Starving
by Jeevan Vasagar


TAHOUA, Niger -- In Tahoua market, there is no sign that times are hard. Instead, there are piles of red onions, bundles of glistening spinach, and pumpkins sliced into orange shards. There are plastic bags of rice, pasta and manioc flour, and the sound of butchers' knives whistling as they are sharpened before hacking apart joints of goat and beef.


A picture taken July 1, 2005 shows the cereal market in the southwestern Niger town of Tahoua. Hundreds of peasant farmers are fleeing into northern Nigeria to escape a drought in the neighbouring west African desert state of Niger, officials said, warning that many would be turned back.(AFP/File/Natasha Burley)
A few minutes' drive from the market, along muddy streets filled with puddles of rainwater, there is the more familiar face of Niger. Under canvas tents, aid workers coax babies with spidery limbs to take sips of milk, or the smallest dabs of high-protein paste.

Wasted infants are wrapped in gold foil to keep them warm. There is the sound of children wailing, or coughing in machine-gun bursts.

"I cannot afford to buy millet in the market, so I have no food, and there is no milk to give my baby," says Fatou, a mother cradling her son Alhassan. Though he is 12 months old he weighs just 3.3kg (around 7lbs).

Fatou, a slender, childlike young woman in a blue shawl, ate weeds to survive before her baby was admitted to a treatment centre run by the medical charity MSF.

This is the strange reality of Niger's hunger crisis. There is plenty of food, but children are dying because their parents cannot afford to buy it.

The starvation in Niger is not the inevitable consequence of poverty, or simply the fault of locusts or drought. It is also the result of a belief that the free market can solve the problems of one of the world's poorest countries.

The price of grain has skyrocketed; a 100kg bag of millet, the staple grain, costs around 8,000 to 12,000 West African francs (around £13) last year but now costs more than 22,000 francs (£25). According to Washington-based analysts the Famine Early Warning System Network (Fewsnet), drought and pests have only had a "modest impact" on grain production in Niger.

The last harvest was only 11% below the five-yearly average. Prices have been rising also because traders in Niger have been exporting grain to wealthier neighbouring countries, including Nigeria and Ghana.

Niger, the second-poorest country in the world, relies heavily on donors such as the EU and France, which favour free-market solutions to African poverty. So the Niger government declined to hand out free food to the starving. Instead, it offered millet at subsidised prices. But the poorest could still not afford to buy.

At Tahoua market the traders are reluctant to talk about the hunger crisis affecting their countrymen as they spread their wares under thatched verandas jutting out from mud buildings. Snatches of the Qur'an from tinny tape players compete with Bollywood songs and the growl of lorries bringing sacks of rice and flour.

One man opens his left palm to display half a dozen tiny scorpions, a living advert for the herbal scorpion antidote he is selling in his other hand.

Omar Mahmoud, 18, who helps sell rice at his father's shop, blames the famine on drought: "I know there is hunger. It is because there wasn't enough rain. The price of millet has gone up because there wasn't enough rain last year."

Last month around 2,000 protesters marched through the streets of the capital, Niamey, demanding free food. The government refused. The same month, G8 finance ministers agreed to write off the country's $2bn (£1.3bn) debt.

"The appropriate response would have been to do free food distributions in the worst-affected areas," said Johanne Sekkenes, head of MSF's mission in Niger.

"We are not speaking about free distribution to everybody, but to the most affected areas and the most vulnerable people."

The UN, whose World Food Programme distributes emergency supplies in other hunger-stricken parts of Africa, also declined to distribute free food. The reason given was that interfering with the free market could disrupt Niger's development out of poverty.

"I think an emergency response should have started much earlier," says Ms Sekkenes. "Now we find ourselves in this serious nutritional crisis, with children under five who are suffering."

Three weeks ago the Niger government, its foreign donor countries and the UN did a volte-face, jointly agreeing to allow the distribution of free food. Aid is now being flown in from Europe and trucked from neighbouring countries.

A total of 3.6 million people live in the regions of Niger affected by the food crisis. According to the most reliable estimate, some 874,000 people now need free food to survive.

The food aid will arrive as children weakened by hunger face a new battle against disease. It is the rainy season in Niger, and the water helps spread diseases such as malaria and diarrhoea.

In the MSF treatment centre, a three-year-old girl called Aminata is suffering from a grotesque eye condition. Her eyeball is so swollen with fluid that it has popped out of her skull and bulges from her face. The doctors call it a retinal blastoma, the result of an untreated eye infection.

"The thing in her eye started off very small," said Aminata's mother, Nisbou. "I did not have money for hospital, so I treated it with herbs, traditional medicine."

The hunger crisis has struck communities which depend on a mix of subsistence farming and herding for their livelihoods. The stories told by the women in the treatment centre show that their plight began when locusts ate their crop and cattle fodder, but spiralled when the prices of food in the market shot out of reach.

In desperate times, adults can get by on the poorest of foods, weeds and the stubble of their crops, but mothers cannot make breastmilk on this diet and infants cannot eat weeds.

Amid the anxiety, there are unexpected moments of gaiety in the feeding centre. Asked her age, Nisbou, who is probably about 20, replied: "I am 100 years old." She burst out laughing at her own joke, then looked weary again, and tucked her baby's deformed face under a lace shawl.
© 2005 Guardian Newspapers Ltd.

###

Ludi
08-01-05, 04:25 PM
This has been the case of most famines, there is plenty of food but because they are poor, the people can't have it. There is still plenty of food produced in the world to feed every human being, yet every year millions of people starve and billions are malnourished.

The sad thing is food aid won't help the people in the long run, because they are still living beyond the resources of their locality. They need help in growing their own food sustainably, and help with planting productive treebelts. So many people in the third world are prevented from providing for themselves because they have to grow commodity crops to pay the taxes on their land.

http://www.greenbeltmovement.org/

http://www.growbiointensive.org/

jbphburg
08-01-05, 04:51 PM
Yes, I agree Ludi, the region they live in must be made capable of supporting agriculture. So very sad to think that there actually is food but the government would withold it for any reason, little babies starving, what the hell kind of a world have we made, or have others made for us...

Michael
08-01-05, 07:51 PM
CNN is going to run a special on this tonight on Anderson Cooper 360. It's tough to watch but it's the only way a lot of people (including myself) can get inspired to do something.

jbphburg
08-01-05, 08:41 PM
Thanks Michael, yes, hard to watch but absolutely necessary for people to see what goes on beyond their everyday view of the world.

Ludi
08-01-05, 10:33 PM
The third world is in the state it is mainly due to colonialism, which is going on to this day. So much of what we in the first world have is due to expoloitation of the third world. We really need to stop expliting them, help them get back to a position in which they can care for themselves once again, which means stopping forcing them to live the way we want them to. How to help them and let them live their own lives, at the same time, is perhaps an impossible task. But they aren't benefiting from globalization, it just makes things worse. So much of the AIDS problem is because traditional lives have been uprooted and people forced to go into cities for jobs, which encourages people to have sex outside of their local population, this has spread AIDS horribly, something that would never have happened if the people had been left alone to live their traditional ways. Food aid unfortunately keeps the population unnaturally high for the ecosystems, which are usually very delicate. Subsistence farming and herding, which may be traditional only since colonial times (a few hundred years) is often a disaster in desertlike ecosystems. This is a tough problem. They have been screwed over for so many years, keeping giving them food aid is like putting a bandaid on a spurting artery. They need help repairing the wound, but how?

FreshTart
08-01-05, 11:47 PM
I disagree with your AIDS opinion. Many groups believe AIDS is being spread due to a tradition that has "spreading your seed" as the main thing that makes a man.

Ludi
08-01-05, 11:52 PM
I'm sure there are many causes, but one I've read is the disruption of local populations, which forces men to take jobs away from family, and the they have sex with many people they wouldn't ordinarily have done.

It probably depends on what articles we've read what we personally believe to be the case.

remilard
08-01-05, 11:52 PM
AIDS would persist in Africa if it were never spread through intercourse. The rate of spread through blood tranfusion is high enough. The problem there has gone far beyond anything sex education could hope to correct. [I cannot speak for the rest of the third world.]

With respect to the topic at hand, I am pretty much on the same page as Ludi. There is no quick fix, we must empower people in famine stricken regions to produce their own food.

jbphburg
08-02-05, 12:04 AM
Yep, it'd take a major international long term commitment to improving the situation on a variety of fronts, think that'll happen? Unfortunately, I think not, very sad.

otomik
08-02-05, 06:15 AM
Niger has the highest birthrate of any country in the world
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/rankorder/2054rank.html
4/5ths is desert, the southern 1/5 is savanah (threatened by desertification from overgrazing)

The Guardian is crap
The starvation in Niger is not the inevitable consequence of poverty, or simply the fault of locusts or drought. It is also the result of a belief that the free market can solve the problems of one of the world's poorest countries.spoken like true arrogant left wingers politicizing starvation.

Gnome Chomsky
08-02-05, 06:20 AM
>>spoken like true arrogant left wingers politicizing starvation.>>

I'm sorry. Starvation is heavily linked to poverty, and is thus a political issue.

ebola

Lina666
08-02-05, 06:24 AM
Why not give poverty filled countries that mcDonalds crap all the fat*boop* eat?

otomik
08-02-05, 06:31 AM
Why not give poverty filled countries that mcDonalds crap all the fat*boop* eat?sure, go ahead, they have the highest birthrate of any country in the world, I'm sure that would solve the problem once and for all:doh:

Scratch
08-02-05, 09:15 AM
sure, go ahead, they have the highest birthrate of any country in the world

Really, I think you mentioned that.

I really don't get this political allegiance BS. Left, right, center and what-****ing-ever. I really don't care either way.

Ludi
08-02-05, 09:16 AM
Why not give poverty filled countries that mcDonalds crap all the fat*boop* eat?

Because they can't afford to buy any food, because they're poor!
:wall:

I agree famine is a political issue. Countries that endure famine often have sufficient resources to feed the people, but don't because of political reasons, desire to control the people, etc.

FreshTart
08-02-05, 12:34 PM
Why not give poverty filled countries that mcDonalds crap all the fat*boop* eat?


I'm sure not all the fat people eat McDonald's. :rolleyes:

LudwigB
08-02-05, 12:58 PM
We need to make a distinction between emergency food aid and long-term food aid. I agree that the latter is not a good idea as it prevents the poor and rural from learning self-sufficient lifestyles, and it places poor nations at the mercy of the West (and thereby lets their governments off the hook for their share of the problem). So long-term hunger relief has to have some sort of "market" component, define that however you will. I don't like market forces any more than anyone else, but they're a reality, and griping about how unfair they are won't make them go away.

But in emergency situations like this, it's totally irresponsible to not step in and either provide direct aid from outside, or for Western interests to buy food at the local market price and redistribute it to those who can't afford it. There will always be some people starving (it's happening here in the US), but this is an especially critical situation that should merit leaving your politico-economic baggage at the door.

At least the G8 wrote off Niger's debt. They aren't totally evil.

Cass
08-02-05, 01:39 PM
But in emergency situations like this, it's totally irresponsible to not step in and either provide direct aid from outside, or for Western interests to buy food at the local market price and redistribute it to those who can't afford it. There will always be some people starving (it's happening here in the US), but this is an especially critical situation that should merit leaving your politico-economic baggage at the door.

Agreed.

This isn't directed in anyone in particular, and I'm sure I'll get negative comments for saying it, but I don't think just discussing poverty/hunger/AIDS will help. It makes me think of those commercials you see on tv, with all the little poor kids.. and people watch and say "those poor things" or something to that effect, and go on with their lives, completely ignoring the fact that they've seen the commercial and know there are people less fortunate than them who are in need of help. Or they say that those charities don't send very much of the money to the children. I kind of think it's an excuse they use.. there are plenty of good charities to send money to.
Not sure where I'm going with this..

Do you do anything? Or just talk?

Ludi
08-02-05, 03:41 PM
I agree just discussing doesn't help. We need to make big changes in our own way of life before we can hope to see equity in the world.

I don't do anything directly for starving people, but indirectly I'm helping by reducing my wasteful, overconsuming way of life, learning to grow my own food, and supporting organisations such as Ecology Action which teach sustainable agriculture.

Joe
08-02-05, 04:10 PM
Do you do anything? Or just talk?

You can click the button on this site once per day to donate food--for free.

http://www.thehungersite.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/CTDSites

Thank you! Your click helps feed the hungry with the value of 1.1 cups of staple food. Please click every day and thank our sponsors below.

There is also a link to buy products that will help the hunger situation in Niger.

Cass
08-02-05, 04:17 PM
Is Ecology Action a national/worldwide organization? I'm interested. I suppose I can google it, lol.

I don't do a whole lot yet. I just started sponsoring a little girl in Tanzania through World Vision. For now, that's all I can afford. I'm excited to start writing to her, and it's also exciting to be learning so much about the country.

Edit.. I completely forgot about the hunger site, even though I have the link in my Favorites folder >_<. *clicks*

vggiegirl
08-02-05, 04:33 PM
I'm sure not all the fat people eat McDonald's. :rolleyes:


Thank you for saying this much more politely than I was going to :bow:

Ludi
08-02-05, 04:42 PM
Is Ecology Action a national/worldwide organization? I'm interested. I suppose I can google it, lol.




Ecology Action works worldwide to teach Biointensive mini-farming, a sustainable farming method. They also publish very useful books and pamphlets about sustainable food production.

http://www.growbiointensive.org/

Research booklets:

http://www.bountifulgardens.org/shop/gb-research-papers.html

Cass
08-02-05, 04:56 PM
Thank you, Ludi!