PDA

View Full Version : Rumsfeld caught lying - on tape



Pages : [1] 2

Jimdavis
March 17th, 2004, 11:11 PM
Donald Rumsfeld on Face The Nation -

http://www.moveon.org/censure/caughtonvideo/

kristadb
March 17th, 2004, 11:23 PM
:lol:

dvmarie
March 17th, 2004, 11:30 PM
How embarrassing!!! :o :lol:
(I don't like him very much, so I have no sympathy)

dcpsoguy
March 17th, 2004, 11:52 PM
Let's not get into important political figures lying.

Because we all know who was worst of all. :p

Dirty Martini
March 18th, 2004, 01:46 AM
Yes, because lying about a blow job was much more important than lying about the need to invade another country.

:p

Fenguin
March 18th, 2004, 03:53 AM
I love the guy in a crazy uncle kind of way, but he got straight-up jizzacked by onetime on that one folks. And the fact that Bill Clinton was a big old liarhead who debated the meaning of the word 'is' doesn't make lying by his Republican counterparts any more excusable. Especially when the matter is about justification for war as opposed to receiving oral sex.

Peebs
March 18th, 2004, 04:23 AM
Speaking of lying, has anyone heard about this business of the Whitehouse making fake news reports about their new medicare bill and sending them to TV stations as actual news packages in order to deceive the public? I was going to make a thread, but I don't have time to find any articles about it. Americans, go correct your clocks: it's 1984.

Someone who knows something please make a thread.

FalafelsRule
March 18th, 2004, 08:01 AM
This man is evil.

automaton
March 18th, 2004, 09:52 AM
A Lying politician? No way!

schu
March 18th, 2004, 10:16 AM
Speaking of lying, has anyone heard about this business of the Whitehouse making fake news reports about their new medicare bill and sending them to TV stations as actual news packages in order to deceive the public? I was going to make a thread, but I don't have time to find any articles about it. Americans, go correct your clocks: it's 1984.

Someone who knows something please make a thread.

The thing that is frustrating to me is that people are surprised to see this.

DRAKE
March 18th, 2004, 12:36 PM
Didn't Congress vote to give authority to Pres. Bush to wage war? Did Kerry in particular vote for it? The decisions were based on the best intelligence that we had. Kerry was on the intelligence committee, he had the same access as President Bush had to the information and drew the same conclusions as did Clinton during his administration.

Tame
March 18th, 2004, 12:46 PM
Speaking of lying, has anyone heard about this business of the Whitehouse making fake news reports about their new medicare bill and sending them to TV stations as actual news packages in order to deceive the public? I was going to make a thread, but I don't have time to find any articles about it. Americans, go correct your clocks: it's 1984.

Someone who knows something please make a thread.

I know commercials using actors as news reporters were made, but IU have not read that these were issued as "news reports" to stations. That doesn't make sense, as any reports like that come to affiliates from networks.

DRAKE
March 18th, 2004, 12:50 PM
These news tidbits have been produced in this same manner since Richard Noxon was in office. Every president since him has done it, although I am sure most of you will concur that somehow Pres. Bush is the only one who did anything wrong

FalafelsRule
March 18th, 2004, 01:55 PM
I love the way he was made to look like the complete @ss he is and on national TV at that. This video snip is classic.

DRAKE
March 18th, 2004, 01:57 PM
and of course any republican tid bits that show Sen. Kerry contradicting himself is most likely just political propaganda

Jimdavis
March 18th, 2004, 03:30 PM
I know commercials using actors as news reporters were made, but IU have not read that these were issued as "news reports" to stations. That doesn't make sense, as any reports like that come to affiliates from networks.

http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~122~2023912,00.html

mouse
March 18th, 2004, 03:54 PM
These VNR's shouldn't be allowed, whether they are produced by Republicans or Democrats.

Tame
March 18th, 2004, 04:01 PM
They look legit to me. They are produced to influence voters, and as they come from the White House, the expectation is that they would support the White House line on issues. No station is forced to run them, and it seems a fair number do not.

Jimdavis
March 18th, 2004, 07:49 PM
They look legit to me. They are produced to influence voters, and as they come from the White House, the expectation is that they would support the White House line on issues. No station is forced to run them, and it seems a fair number do not.

But that raises the question whether the VNR [when watched] looks as if it comes from the White House or from a newscaster, and whether the stations ran some disclaimer across the screen saying "This video was supplied by The Department of Health and Human Services."

Jim

Tame
March 18th, 2004, 07:55 PM
But that raises the question whether the VNR [when watched] looks as if it comes from the White House or from a newscaster, and whether the stations ran some disclaimer across the screen saying "This video was supplied by The Department of Health and Human Services."

Jim

That would be the responsibility of the stations.

Jimdavis
March 18th, 2004, 08:01 PM
That would be the responsibility of the stations.

So what responsibility does the government have, in your opinion, to differentiate between a campaign ad that it should pay for and a news release that touts its successes? Or is there any difference in your opinion?

Jim

Tame
March 18th, 2004, 08:04 PM
So what responsibility does the government have, in your opinion, to differentiate between a campaign ad that it should pay for and a news release that touts its successes? Or is there any difference in your opinion?

Jim

It wasn't technically a campaign ad. It was a White House news release related to Medicare. The advantage of being an incumbent...
The TV stations know the source of the ad, so they have the responsibility of treating it as they choose.

epski
March 18th, 2004, 08:07 PM
It wasn't technically a campaign ad. It was a White House news release related to Medicare. The advantage of being an incumbent...
The TV stations know the source of the ad, so they have the responsibility of treating it as they choose.

But what of the audience?

Jimdavis
March 18th, 2004, 08:11 PM
It wasn't technically a campaign ad. It was a White House news release related to Medicare. The advantage of being an incumbent...
The TV stations know the source of the ad, so they have the responsibility of treating it as they choose.

All true. So the only differentiation in your eyes is whether your tax dollar is spent for the news release or the GOP's coffers are depleted for the ad, but that there needs to be no content differentiation between a campaign ad and an issue news release by an incumbent?

Jim

DRAKE
March 18th, 2004, 08:37 PM
You guys are right..damn Clinton and Carter for ever using them! :)